The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
Brothers and Sisters, I am puzzled, though not shocked. I struggled for a few weeks with a Tyan Tomcat 1815e and a P3/1Ghz CPU. The thing was too slow for a 1-gig. It ran about as fast as an older 500Mhz machine I once had. My friends and I struggled to make the BIOS accept the on-chip L2 cache, but it refused. Yesterday I was given a pile of old computer parts by a business in the county. Included was a pair of Microstar mobos. With a 750Mhz Athlon, using the same RAM and the same harddrive (using the already installed OS), this thing runs like fire. Under the P3, it took about 3 hours recompile the system core on FreeBSD 4.11. Under the Athlon, it was less than two hours. 1. Is the Athlon that much better than a P3? 2. Could it be the mobo is so much faster internally? (Microstar KT7 Pro2-A) More: using the same video card (Voodoo 3 3000) now KDE runs like a light GUI. I click on Konsole and it fills the screen instantly. It's really that fast. Opera takes about 3 seconds. Mozilla 1.75 opens in about 8 seconds. With the old setup, it was at least double that, with visible layers of the window appearing as slow re-paints on the screen. Now it appears whole. This, with only 16MB VRAM. Hardware gurus, what am I seeing? Ed Hurst ----------- A Bible Site -- http://webs.tconline.net/softedges/ Linux & Unix Help -- http://ed.asisaid.com/ Blog -- http://ed.asisaid.com/blog/
| Home |