The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
How do you figure that a licensing issue might be involved here? At 10:32 PM 2/4/05, Christopher Rose wrote: >Given how Micro$oft likes to force a license onto you for every piece of >software installed and Linux doesn't, perhaps the people at >Mozilla/Firefox have chosen to go the route of open source and no licence. >I am using Firefox 1.0 and it works fine for me, but then again, I >strictly use Linux. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Frank Bax" <fbax at sympatico.ca> >To: christiansource at ofb.biz >Subject: [CS-FSLUG] Is FireFox anti-microsoft? >Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:08:17 -0500 > > > > > Are there any other file systems besides MS that either use drive > > letters or do not have a single 'root' directory (MS has a root > > dir for each drive letter)? I ask because I thought I found a bug > > in FireFox: > > http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=213537 > > But when I searched Bugzilla, I found this one that seems the same: > > > > > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257321>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257321 > > Now I'm wondering if the FireFox people have taken an > > anti-microsoft stand, but are pretending not to?
| Home |