The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
On Mon February 7 2005 11:05 pm, N. Thompson wrote: > A lot of people already said exactly what you just said David, and I > agree with you too. Another thing people have noted is that Java has the > same problems because of JNI and really C and C++ are much more powerful > and important languages than Java, and across most platforms are still > the only programming languages which are officially supported by a full > API. Cutting out C and C++ would be a huge mistake for anyone and would > leave most customers looking for competing products that did support the > two languages such as Borland's IDEs, plus if software were to be > developed entirely in programming languages like Java everyone would > need computers with at least three times the speed of whats available > today in order to get close to the same performance out of those > programming languages as C++ got out of computers about two years or so > ago when people were all still using 800 MHz machines. The real problem isn't the language used, it's MickySoft! If all this was being done open source, we'd all feel a LOT better about it, but it's not. The design and code is from the WORST company for both! Fred -- The only bug free software from MickySoft is still shrink-wrapped in their warehouse..."
| Home |