The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear brothers and sisters, this email is mainly a request for contacts in Warsaw + prayer. (The request for contacts is URGENT in the sense that responses after Tuesday Feb 15 cannot possibly help, and every needless delay will make things more difficult.) I'm flying to Warsaw this coming Wednesday morning where I've been invited to a meeting of a committee of the Polish parliament where I've been invited to speak and also deliver a well-deserved thank-you letter concerning an action which Poland has taken to prevent a disaster with software patents in the EU (see below for some details about what this is all about). In the evening I'd like very much to give an evangelistic talk on the topic "What Free Software and Poland's action against software patents have to do with my desire to live a meaningful life." The idea for this is to give testimony about my experience of having come into a personal relationship with God through faith in Jesus Christ and to explain what problems are caused in the world today by wicked human business empires and how gospel of the Kingdom of God (as contained in the Bible) is an answer to this. This will be an evangelistic talk. When communicating with someone who is not known to be a Christians I've described the type of my planned talk with the words "Even though this talk will be from a Christian, Biblical perspective, no previous knowledge of religious matters will be required to understand what I have on my heart to say." Obviously this is extremely short notice, and I don't know how many people I might manage to attract. But I certainly wouldn't want to leave unused what may be a good evangelistic opportunity. I'm comfortable with speaking in any kind of venue including (but not limited to) a rented room in a restaurant, a lecture hall, a private living room, or any kind of "church" facilities. I'd *really* appreciate of someone could put me in touch with someone in Warsaw who may be able to help me with organizing such an evangelistic talk, on short notice as it is. Please pray for this. Also, if someone has contacts to Christian media, it would be good to invite them to attend both the press conference (which will be in the early afternoon) and my talk in the evening. The threat of software patents is such an important topic that it is certainly good if as many praying Christians as possible can be made aware of the issue. (Inviting representatives of secular media to that press conference is good too, of course, although I believe that there's someone in Warsaw already working on that.) Now for some background history which explains not only more than you ever wanted to know about EU software patents politics, but also how I came to get invited to speak to all those influential Polish politicians: Software patents are so unpopular among EU politicians that those who have been pushing the adoption of the directive which would legalize them have felt forced to tell lies claiming that the proposed directive text disallows software patents. The reality is that the proposed directive text allows not only patents on software ideas, but also e.g. on ideas for surgical procedures. (In the "EU", a "directive" is something which every member country will have to turn into national law). What happened was that a very bad draft directive text was proposed by the "EU Commission" and given to the EU parliament. The EU parliament then did a lot of work, making a lot of good changes which modified the very bad draft directive text into something that's actually acceptable. The main point is that the EU parliament inserted precise definitions of what is a patentable "technical invention", thereby limiting the scope of patentability to what has traditionally been patentable. After this work was complete, something really astonishing happened: The "EU Commission" made a "political agreement" on a "compromise" which is in fact worse than the original directive draft was, totally ignoring all the good changes from the EU parliament. This "compromise" text was then translated into all languages of EU member countries and inserted on extremely short notice as a so-called "A-item" onto the agenda of the "Agricultural Council" meeting (where each EU member country is represented, typically by the minister of agriculture, or a diplomat of that country) of Dec 21, 2004. The meaning of an "A-item" is that if it's on the agenda and no-one says anything about it during the meeting, it has been passed. This procedure is meant for uncontroversial points where no further discussion is needed and holding a formal vote of the representatives of the member countries is considered to be unnecessary. However this procedure can also be used to proposed directives adopted for which a "political agreement" exists which does have actually have a majority of votes among member countries. This totally undemocratic decision-making process works by applying political pressure to remain silent on the representatives of member countries who have doubts or objections about a proposed directive. At the "Agricultural Council" meeting of Dec 21, 2004 this had been orchestrated and everyone expected the plan to work until, to everyone's surprise, the Polish minister for Science and Information Technology showed up to represent Poland at that "Agricultural Council" meeting with an objection against passing that "software patents directive" as an A-item. In reaction I created an online thank-you letter for the Polish government at http://thankpoland.info which has by now >30000 confirmed signatures. Apparently this is appreciated in Warsaw and I got a nice, although pretty sudden, invitation. :-) Of course we'd all like to know who is behind that strange push for legalizing software patents. What is clear is that neither the EU parliament nor the national parliaments of member countries are behind it. In fact in several countries whose governments supported that weird "political agreement", the national parliaments have reacted by passing resolutions against software patents. (A problem here is that it's not illegal for national governments to simply ignore such resolutions from their national parliaments.) Florian Mueller, a well- informed lobbyist in Brussels, explains the phenomenon as follows on http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=351 : "That political agreement had been fabricated in a ruthless and untruthful way by then-Commissioner Bolkestein and the then-Irish presidence of the Council. The Irish government simply does whatever Microsoft tells it to do. Microsoft is Ireland's largest tax-payer since all of Microsoft's European business is done out of Ireland. Unfortunately, the rest of Europe is stupid enough to let Ireland not only suck a lot of potential revenue out of the rest of the EU but also to let Ireland push aggressively for software patents." Greetings, Norbert. - -- Founder & Steering Committee member of DotGNU, see http://dotgnu.org/ Free Software Business Strategy Guide ---> http://FreeStrategy.info Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland) Tel +41 44 972 20 59 Fax +41 44 972 20 69 http://bollow.ch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCD67soYIVvXUl7DIRAs/6AJ94YC85l9kJVVYZUdAUN3y0VzFKJQCgpbqo zgZHkrI2vkrjOCr5cRmZQ1k= =qxVm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Home |