The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
Don Parris wrote: > I really want to be sure my understanding (at least at a basic level) > is accurate. Are the reasons for linking programs the same reasons I > mention? I mean, for someone new to all of this, it could be a bit > daunting. I never really paid it much attention, to be honest. Why > is there no dependency hell in Windows? Is it because the devs > include all the necessary libraries in their program? Should I assume > this is an inefficient coding practice? There is only one GUI for Windows, so to speak. You can bring in other toolkits (my wife has tcl/tk for Windows on her computer), but there is only one API. Unix has far more choice. The big four are Gtk2, Qt, Motif (still) and X/Athena. There are dozens of others, too. -- Ed Hurst ----------- A Bible Site -- http://webs.tconline.net/softedges/ Computer Help -- http://ed.asisaid.com/ Blog -- http://ed.asisaid.com/blog/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.2.0 - Release Date: 2/21/05
| Home |