The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
Hmm... I really was fiery. Forgive me if my posts come across too edgy. I knew better than to write them half way through all the good condemnations going on in the aformentioned sermon, "The Dangers of an Unconverted Ministry." Not being the speaking/preaching type, and certainly not of the fire and brimstone type, I still could have probably done an off-the-cuff pulpit pounding last hour. :-) Again, I'm sorry if it comes over as too harsh. -Tim On Feb 28, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Timothy R. Butler wrote: >> >> And I suppose that that is sad, if the improvements are good ones. >> But >> it was the right of the improver to set his own terms for how the >> program was to be used, just as it was the right of the original >> author >> to set his. The original author respected future programmers enough >> not >> to step on their rights. > > Future developers have no rights, they have privileges granted to > them. Software under any license is copyrighted, and therefore has no > "rights" given to anyone other than the original creator. > > It's like Jonathan Edwards spoke about in "Sinners in the Hands of an > Angry God." There is nothing but God's mere pleasure keeping the > unrepentant from Hell. They are no more secure than a spider on a web > about to be crushed by a rock. It is only by God's pleasure keeping > everyone from being tossed into eternal torture right now (even those > with the Grace of Christ, since it was only God's pleasure that > granted it).[*] > > In very profane sense, the same goes with software. There is nothing > but my good pleasure that allows you to use my code at all. Therefore, > you have no right to demand more freedom. You are only receiving the > privileges given because I feel like it. > >> I don't see why this fear should matter to someone who's only >> interested >> in benefitting the community. After all, if I'm truly altruistic, why >> should I care whether someone closes a derivative of my code and makes >> money on it? More power to them. It was their right as a deriver, >> after all. > > I don't create software for the good of the world. I create it > because it is a means to an end. A BSD license doesn't get me to my > end because people take my code and keep their modifications. The GPL > does help reach my end since it gives me something back for giving > them all of my backbreaking work. > > -Tim > -- > [*] If I sound fiery right now, that's because I've dealt with > Edward's sermon in multiple places in the last week and am presently > reading Gilbert Tennent's "Dangers of an Unconverted Ministry." Expect > Free Software brimstone in my next message. ;-) >> --------------------------------------------------------------- > Timothy R. Butler Universal Networks www.uninet.info > ==================== <tbutler at uninet.info> ==================== > | Christian Portal: | Have you not learned great lessons | > | www.faithtree.com | from those who braced themselves | > | GNU/Linux News: | against you and disputed the | > | www.ofb.biz | passage with you? --Walt Whitman | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Presently on "Albert" (DP PPC 970 "G5" running at 2.0 GHz) > > > _______________________________________________ > ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list > Christiansource at ofb.biz > http://cs.uninetsolutions.com > --------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy R. Butler Universal Networks www.uninet.info ==================== <tbutler at uninet.info> ==================== | Christian Portal: | Have you not learned great lessons | | www.faithtree.com | from those who braced themselves | | GNU/Linux News: | against you and disputed the | | www.ofb.biz | passage with you? --Walt Whitman | --------------------------------------------------------------- Presently on "Albert" (DP PPC 970 "G5" running at 2.0 GHz)
| Home |