The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
On 5/19/05, Don Parris <gnumathetes at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone else here see the irony of Communist Cuba adopting libre > software, especially while the libre US continues its dependence on > non-free software. ;) I don't think that it's ironic at all. To me, the ideas of communism and open source seem to have a much closer correspondence then that of free enterprise and open source. Of course, communism in theory and communism in practice are two different things... human sinfulness always gets in the way. Anyways, I think that the main reason for this is political... Microsoft is a US-based company after all, and it and the US don't get along to well. Hence, you gain access to and control over the source code so you can ensure that backdoors are in the compiled software (unless of course your compiler setup to insert those backdoors but let's not go there). I think that in China, there's actually a government-sponsored Linux distribution for example. David
| Home |