The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
I prefer the either fully written out or the YYYY/MM/DD format. That way there's the least confusion. If you think about it, YYYY/MM/DD makes a lot more sense to because most other things go from the top on the left to the bottom on the right too. * time (hours:minutes:seconds) * paths (/usr/src/linux) * numbers Alan Trick On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:39 -0400, Frank Bax wrote: > Somebody mentioned that a rare event happened early this morning because at > about 1:02 am the time was 01:02:03 04-05-06 in HH:MM:SS MM-DD-YY format. > > I thought this was unusual to have the time come first, then figured out > that... > > It happens again on May-5th with DD-MM-YY format (the 'standard' date > format in Canada). > > Using D-M-Y H-M-S, it'll be 8-7-6-5-4-3 on Jul 8th and 4-5-6-7-8-9 on May 5th. > > Using M-D-Y H-M-S, it'll be 8-7-6-5-4-3 on Aug 7th and 4-5-6-7-8-9 about > 7am this morning. > > Using Y-M-D H-M-S, it'll be 06-07-08 09:10:11 on Jul-8th. > > Interesting to note the patterns occur twice on each of three days this year. > > On Jun-6, it'll be 6-6-6-6-6-6 and it doesn't matter what format you use > that day. > > Apparently these "events" are not so rare after all. > > > _______________________________________________ > ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list > Christiansource at ofb.biz > http://cs.uninetsolutions.com
| Home |