The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
Sophie Hamilton wrote: >> The only conclusion I can draw is that Windows laptops are not >> reliable with sleep or hibernation. And surely, Linux can't be worse! > > Actually, Windows is fine with hibernation. I know this, because I use > it pretty much all the time when I use Windows. Some are notoriously bad. My mom's Gateway running XP never comes out of either suspend mode properly. OTOH, I have had several with worked fine in the appropriate version of Windows. With Linux, especially in the last couple of years with the advent of s2ram and s2disk, it's gotten much easier. However, configuration may still be quite a bit of work. Having to run diagnostics is so common, there are several sites with pages devoted to instructions on it. FreeBSD still doesn't implement ACPI properly, and when they do, it's pretty specific to the hardware. They don't even have a generic path to writing a saved state to disk, which the Linux kernel does. My understanding is MS uses very hardware-specific ACPI instructions, whereas Linux and other OSS find a generic path with switches for most variations. When MS doesn't work, it's really broken badly. When Linux doesn't work, it may still come quite close. -- Ed Hurst ------------ Associate Editor, Open for Business: http://ofb.biz/ Applied Bible - http://soulkiln.org/ Kiln of the Soul - http://soulkiln.blogspot.com/
| Home |