The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
I must run to work, but I would like to point out this: On Sunday 03 May 2009 16.08.15 Timothy Butler wrote: > KDE needs two things, I think, to be what it really should be > (because it has always been technologically sound): stable and > simple. > > Stable in this sense: In 10 years, KDE has broken binary > compatibility 3 times. GNOME and Mac OS have broken it once, and both > with sufficient ease of running older library side-by-side that few > people noticed it. Windows has not fully broken it ever. KDE ought to > commit to insuring ABI integrity for 10 years -- even if it means > eventually having multiple versions of the libraries, so long as one > configuration tool can manage all of them. With Qt now LGPL'ed, > businesses might consider it -- rather than their traditional > preference for GNOME -- but they'll want assurance that KDE is > serious about business first. It's perfectly doable, and I don't think it's much of KDE's business. Right now I can run KDE3 and KDE4 apps simultaneously because Slackware provides a KDE3 compatibility layer (with selected libraries, and so on). This comes at the cost that right now I am not able to compile KDE3 stuff on this machine (only KDE4 stuff). But the point is that binary compatibility *can* be done in a matter of something as simple as installing packages, and even an undermanned, underpowered and simple distro can do that in a very simple way. Why the Fedoras and Ubuntus of the world can't, then? > > Simple in this sense: even if you do provide massive configurability > to the user, it should be hidden in advanced dialog boxes. The basic > configuration boxes should be simple enough that a novice can feel > confident changing basic settings without reading a manual. I think systemsettings does the job quite nicely. Blessings, Eduardo -- Eduardo Sanchez, B. Th. Traductor Público Inglés-Español http://shadow.sombragris.org -------------------------------------------------------------- Then to the rolling Heav'n itself I cried, Asking, "What Lamp had Destiny to guide Her little Children stumbling in the Dark?" And--"A blind understanding!" Heav'n replied. -- The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam --------------------------------------------------------------
| Home |