The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:10:49 -0500, Timothy Butler <tbutler at ofb.biz> wrote: > You know, Ed, Ubuntu would probably be a lot more pleasant on your new > machine. You might try the most recent Ubuntu Long Term Support release > on it (not Kubuntu, I'd suggest). The LTS releases would give you the > non-rolling release style you like, and I find Ubuntu offers the most > "just works" and "non-intrusive" functionality of the distros. Except when it doesn't. Every time I've tried it, the monitor was *always* wrong and there's no simple resolution (four different monitors). I've had to rewrite the xorg.conf by hand, chasing down all the caveats involved in that -- and there are many. That's what I meant by a totally different set of expectations: They tweak the whole thing to the point it either works immediately or not at all. I've never done half so much tweaking and fighting with Xorg as I did on the Ubuntus. Frankly, such a major failure has soured me on ever giving them another chance. I find their approach perverse, not at all like vanilla Debian. Besides, the next iteration of LTS won't be until they start the 10.x series, as I understand it. Meanwhile, the old 8.04, from what I've read, suffers the same driver issues as CentOS/RHEL -- the kernel can't talk to the SATA interface on recent Intel chipsets, so it hangs during initialization. -- Ed Hurst ------------ Associate Editor, Open for Business: http://ofb.biz/ Applied Bible - http://soulkiln.org/ Kiln of the Soul - http://soulkiln.blogspot.com/
| Home |