The following archives are provided as a public service to the community. Opinions archived here do not necessarily represent the opinions of Open for Business or its contributors.
Hi, I know this email borders a little closer on the not-technological as I give my thoughts on your question... Sorry if it crosses the line. There are a number of very intelligent people high up in government who know a LOT more about the Internet than I do. In short, if our current administration decides to shut down the Internet, I do not think they would do it in such an ineffective manner as disabling the DNS. I actually know people who know people (I have actually met one of them) who works in these realms, and the guy I met was scary-smart. A simple law that was passed which made the Internet illegal would be much more effective. The government could then shut down the Internet pipe-lines, leaving rogue wireless meshes to connect us... Secondly, the Internet is such an important aspect of Interstate and cross-country commerce, Credit-cards, etc. that shutting down the Internet would be the death of much of the International financial system. Even China, which is extremely restrictive on their Internet, has allowed the Internet in some form or other. So I am not worried any country whacking their own Internet completely. But, if the DNS went away, there would be some alternatives which would crop up fairly quickly. If we think for a few minutes, I am sure we could all come up with a number if names of people high up in the open-source realms who are very smart and who would be very mad if the Internet went down like that. I doubt that you or I would end up needing to work much to get our systems active. Someone else would put up a DNS peer-to-peer mesh that would propagate massive lists of IP addresses or something... You would probably only have a few days of down-time before a patch solution was out there. Your DNS caching nameservers would last only 3 days at the most before they need to refresh themselves. A service like opendns.com would keep a lot of other DNS entries in them and have a lot more DNS stuff cached; I would point my DNS to them. (Except, of course, the government would probably do something a lot more interesting than just blocking the root servers; it is extremely easy to intercept all DNS queries that go outside your network.) In short, I feel that someone else can worry about this question if they want to. :) If something is going to happen to the Internet from a hacker, the DNS might be it. But it is a government, it will be something much more intrusive and much, much harder to combat. - Tim Young Ed Hurst wrote: > Trying to avoid the political implications here, I'm hoping we can > stick to the topic: DNS service. > > My knowledge is limited. Let's pretend for a moment some ruler decides > for his country to "shut down the Net" the only way he knows -- kill > the root DNS servers, or something similar. > > For those running a namecaching server, that's not immediately a > problem for their favorite sites. However, I am under the impression > that server tries to renew/recheck now and then. Am I mistaken? Is > there a way to prevent losing all your favorites if DNS disappears? > > Feel free to ridicule my ignorance, but at least try to answer the > main question. :-D >
| Home |