| Home |
Article Path: Home: Computers and Technology: Not Buying It Re: Not Buying It Actually, the 12” PowerBook did not offer the same sort of spec and features as the larger PowerBooks. It was essentially an iBook in the clothing of a PowerBook. Get your facts straight. Posted by Thomas Massengale - Jan 17, 2008 | 9:35:8 Re: Not Buying It I could not have summarized my position better, Mr. Butler. I agree with your thoughtful review. I have used my trusty PowerBook G4 12” for non-professional video editing for years. The MacBook Air, however, does no appeal to me. No Firewire, no thank you. I was hoping not for a new product, but a thinner MacBook Pro line (and then MacBook line months later). The MacBook Pro 15” is too large for economy coach tray tables (I don’t have a private jet). So I have a MacBook in my shopping cart (my PB-G412” will soon be on eBay…). The MacBook has a nice footprint. It has Firewire, capacious Hard Drive, 4MB memory. It can handle HD video editing, albeit slowly, and I can connect to a larger display. I am sold on Apple products, surely. My PB-G412” has cost me about $1.25 per day to use over the years. MacWorld, alas, had little to offer me this year. No complaints; it can’t be everything to everyone. Posted by J Hale - Jan 17, 2008 | 10:52:33 Re: Not Buying It Mr. Massengale, my facts are quite straight. Note I did not say everything was the same, I noted however the clock speed was the same, which it was. The 12” also supported dual heads when the iBook supported merely mirroring, and usually had a video card that, while not as good as its larger brethren, was better than the iBook’s card. That’s pretty much the way it ran through all the specs. AirPort and Bluetooth became standard on the PB12” at the same time it became standard on the other PowerBooks, not the iBooks. All in all, my sense was it was much more in league with the PowerBook line, save on a few things, like the Ethernet card. Mr. Hale, thank you for your comments. I think Apple underestimated the number of PowerBook 12” users out there who really want the same type of unit, not to mention the potential for such a machine to draw switchers. Enjoy your MacBook! Posted by Timothy R. Butler - Jan 17, 2008 | 13:9:19 Re: Not Buying It Any product is aimed at a specific market. You prefer a MacBook Pro? Fine, it’s because the MacBook Air is not done for you. Who cares? It is not aimed at me either. No problem: I have a 24” iMac and I’m interested in a 8 core MacPro. Who cares? But don’t you think that it will perfectly fit the needs of some? The MacBook Air is aimed at those people. And the only important thing for Apple is to have a solution suitable for anyone. This is just one more “Not Buying It” article, after the iPhone, the MacBook Air. Same story. Same writers? And you now the story. Pointless article, but you will get your hits. Congratulation. Posted by Didier Kobi - Jan 17, 2008 | 14:24:46 Re: Not Buying It I don’t think this article is pointless. I’ve been trying to find a reason for me to switch from MBP to MBA and it’s hard. I travel alot but at the same time I have semi-professional demands - thus is rather dependent on CPU and RAM. I will wait until real life tests are getting around and if it keeps up with PS and InDesign I will probably switch. Importing video for editing will be done on my stationary. Obviously this is an “executive” item or second computer machine. It’s bugging me Apple didn’t leave 160 GB HD for build to order - there are 160 GB 1.8 disk in the iPod… Posted by fredrik - Jan 17, 2008 | 15:37:39 Re: Not Buying It Mr. Kobi, actually, I’ve never written such an article before. The key here is two fold: (1) Apple discontinued a product that fit a very decent size market’s need, e.g. a professional semi-desktop replacement in a small form factor, and (2) released a niche, almost luxury laptop which has a much smaller market. The product I hoped for (and many hoped for) was not some dream product, but rather a product line that Apple offered until just a couple of years ago. I’m not saying the Air shouldn’t have been released, but if they’d made it a bit thicker, they could have targeted a larger market and offered an upgrade path for all of us still using the 12” PowerBook waiting for something that can replace it to come along. Posted by Timothy R. Butler - Jan 17, 2008 | 19:31:28 Re: Not Buying It; 15 Mr. BUTLER, I agree with you. I do not find a FW400 port to be redundant with USB 2.0, but maybe wireless connection to a distal laser disc drive obviates this. Regardless, MB-AIR should have been given 1 FW400 port. Posted by MacRand - Jan 17, 2008 | 22:13:21 Re: Not Buying It Count me as another 12-inch Powerbook owner who was waiting hopefully…and was really disappointed. I use my 12-inch Powerbook for DJ-ing, and (aside from the lack of back-lit keyboard, sometimes an issue in a dark DJ booth) it’s been near-perfect in form-factor, functionality and performance. But the software I use (Serato Scratch Live for DJ-ing) is slowly creeping upward in minumum requirements as new features are added. I’m already locked out of the new video add-on they recently announced (won’t run on PPC at all). I can’t use the Macbook Air at all. I need at least two USB ports and Firewire. The Macbook would be a step down in a few important ways…and the plastic-case design is not optimal for high-CPU use for long periods under hot conditions (like in a DJ booth). If my 12-inch Powerbook dropped dead today, I’d probably have to buy a 15-inch MPB and be irritated that it’s both larger than I really want. Posted by Mark - Jan 18, 2008 | 3:47:7 Re: Not Buying It All good things to those who wait. !!! Posted by pb12 - Jan 24, 2008 | 6:56:14 Re: Not Buying It There is a point to this article as it outlines a Mac users views on Apple’s latest product. A product released on the back of many comments from Mac users who would clearly like a smaller form factor MBP. It also touches on a broader point, namely that many were expecting MacBook Pro updates generally; especially upgrades to the processor and case design. The rumour seems to be that this was indeed planned for Macworld, but the chips weren’t ready on time. Although it’s doubtful they have a 11/12” MacBook Pro as it would compete with the MacBook Air. It does seem a lost opportunity, an attempt to trailblaze that comes off as gimmicky. A laptop too weak to be used by pro’s, and too expensive to use as a secondary machine for most. It is quite difficult to see who this is aimed at. Another reason many would like to see a little more focus on MacBook Pro’s is that they’re getting a little long in the tooth. You can pick up many laptops with better components, especially larger screen resolutions, for $500 less. Hardly a great advert for a cutting-edge company. Posted by Insane - Jan 25, 2008 | 17:24:59 Please enter your comment entry below. Press 'Preview' to see how it will look. | ||||||||
The Danger of PeacemakerBy Timothy R. ButlerHere is a story. The leaders of a church have a personal agenda against someone and want to quiet him, exact revenge or what have you. They not only come at him within their church, they continue by following him outside of that church to any other church he seeks refuge at and any place he works, making a wreck of his life in the process. That is the sort of thing that only happened in the past, in dusty tales of witch-hunts in Salem or the Inquisition in Spain, right? Wrong: it is happening today, perhaps at a seemingly normal church near you. |
Help Us Serve YouOpen for Business strives to serve up the most interesting, relevant content possible; however, we can only do so with your help. Please take a few moments to fill out our online survey so that we can learn more about the interests of our readers, readers such as you. |
Tap the Power of
|
| Home |
| © 2001-2010 Universal Networks, All Rights Reserved. Some content rights may be held by Universal Networks' providers and used under license. Powered by ServerForest and SAFARI. Learn about our privacy policy here. |